Nettet10. des. 2024 · In Lily Thomas v. Union of India, (2000) 6 SCC 224, Lily had filed the petition in the Supreme Court on status of the earlier marriage regarding a case when a non-Muslim gets converted to the ‘Muslim’ faith without any real change or belief without divorcing first wife. NettetLily Thomas (1927–10 December 2024) was an Indian lawyer who filed petitions in India's highest court and provincial courts to enhance and modify current laws. …
Lily Thomas - Wikipedia
Nettet28. mai 2024 · Title of case : Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Citation: AIR 1995 SC 1531. Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: Kuldip Singh and R.M. Sahai. Date Decided: 10 th May, 1995. Appellant: Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani and Ors.. Respondent : Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Facts . … Nettet13. jun. 2024 · Lily Thomas pleaded before the court to male polygamy in Muslim Law to be unconstitutional. It was urged before the court to apply Uniform Civil Code so as to deal with vast socio-legal issues that were due to various religious personal law. recs vs eacs
Representation of People Act – Recent Verdicts Simplified
NettetCase Summary - Lily Thomas v Union of India (2013) Background This case pertains to the disqualification of Members of Parliament or the Legislature as the case may be and was pronounced by a two-judge bench comprised of Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.J. Mukhopadhaya in the year 2013. Two petitions were filed before the Supreme Court, … Nettet1. jun. 2024 · The Delhi High Court in its judgment delivered on 4 th August 2016 held that Delhi continues to be a Union Territory despite Article 239AA. It further held that the special provisions incorporated for Delhi do not overrule the effect of Article 239 . Article 239 empowers the Lieutenant Governor to act independently of his Council of Ministers. NettetLily Thomas v. Union of India & ors. In Supreme Court of India Citation AIR 2000 SC 1650 Petitioner Lily Thomas Respondent Union Of India & Ors Date of Judgement 5 th April, 2000 Bench A.K. Patnaik, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya Facts. This case brought the landmark judgment in the legal history of India. The case is landmark because … upcoming mech games