WebPurpose: This study was to compare the predictive validity of Norton Scale(1962), Cubbin & Jackson Scale(1991), and Song & Choi Scale(1991). Method: Data were collected three times per week from 48-72 hours after admission based on the four pressure sore risk assessment scales and a skin assessment tool for pressure sore on 112 intensive care … http://www.course.sdu.edu.cn/G2S/eWebEditor/uploadfile/20140403113405418.pdf

Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson ...

WebNov 1, 1999 · The complete revised Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator is shown in Table 6. Use of specialized beds It has always been a wish or perhaps an ambition, for want of a better word, to be able to identify accurately which bed would be most suitable at which score rating. However, trials of this nature could prove unethical. Webthe Cubbin and Jackson scale (cut‑off 28) had 95.0%, 81.5%, 53.5%, 98.6%, respectively. The AUCs of the ROC curve were 0.881 for the Braden, 0.890 for the Song and Choi and 0.902 for the Cubbin and Jackson. Conclusions The results of this research sample showed that the Cubbin and Jackson scale was most effective in chill out mix korean doll like

Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin …

WebFeb 1, 2004 · This study was to compare the validity of three pressure ulcer risk tools: Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scales. Data were collected three times per … WebYoung Ah Kim. The purposes of this study were to examine the predictive validity of the Cubbin and Jackson pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for the development of pressure ulcers in intensive ... WebNorton Scale, Gouglas Scale, Waterlow Scale, and Cubbin & Jackson Scale are the most widely used. Nevertheless, a recent systematic review by Liu et al. (2012) indicates that although the Braden scale is the most commonly used scale globally, the Cubbin & Jackson scale has a better prediction ability in ICU patients. chilloutmix_niprunedfp32